Do you think internationalization erodes the sovereignty of state?

answer Expert Verified. For me the answer is NO, because each states has its own governing bodies, policies and rules. No other states can dictate or eve influence a particular states. Internationalization is a set of standard which can be applied to a particular products or business.

answer:

Ano po sagot dyann

diko din po Alam eh

For me the answer is NO, because each states has its own governing bodies, policies and rules. No other states can dictate or eve influence a particular states. Internationalization is a set of standard which can be applied to a particular products or business. Some business organization are trying to  collaborate with an international firm for the purpose of improving products and services. Again internationalization does not damage the sovereignty of the states.

For me the answer is NO, because each states has its own governing bodies, policies and rules. No other states can dictate or eve influence a particular states. Internationalization is a set of standard which can be applied to a particular products or business.

Maybe By definition, to internationalize would be to erode national sovereignty.

Explanation:

Global governance, or internationalization as you say, comes at the cost of national sovereignty.

With that said, others will expound on the negative impacts, others will discuss the positive benefits. But, by definition, of course, as the one is implicit in the other.

An international law, a treaty, an agreement, binding standards of participation in some organization, by definition, limit the prerogatives of States, therefore limits national sovereignty. Many countries choose to limit some aspects of their national sovereignty for the benefits gained from global cooperation on matters of global importance. Others pretend they do. For example, conventions that limit non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; China and Russia both parties, would not help, let us say, Japan to acquire these, but have helped Syria, North Korea, Iraq, Pakistan and further afield.

yes because

Explanation:

because it is because

basta yes na

“Internationalization” is not a well-defined concept. States are sovereign. No international organization can have powers not given to it by its member states. The only one where those powers reach deep into domestic governance is the EU; hence the complexity of Brexit. The UN Security Council, which is perhaps the second most powerful, can in theory require (“call on”) states to do or not do anything, but in practice the five permanent members can veto anything and no UNSC resolution is self-enforcing; member states either do or don’t obey such “calls.” The IMF has some de facto power over states in financial distress, since private lenders may make their loans dependent on an IMF loan, although it is important to remember that this is really strong states (the ones with voting power in the IMF) imposing their will on weak states.

#JuneChallenge

#BrainlySummerChallenge

PLEASE GIVE ME BIG RATE AND A BIG THANKS FOR MY ANSWERS!!